Denying the Antecedent

This is the logical fallacy when after you assert that A implies B, you then assert that Not A implies Not B.

The latter does not follow from the former. For example, "I live in Palo Alto, therefore I must be in California" does not imply "I don't live in Palo Alto, therefore I don't live in California"
 

Then I asked myself to find a more personal example.

So I decided to dig through my personal Philosophistry and said to myself, "I bet I could find an example in like 5 minutes" and lo and behold, I found one in the first text file that I opened...

I said

1) Don't do anything you don't love, cuz if you love it, then you're good to go

this can be paraphrased as ( "If you love something do it" implies "If you don't love something don't do it" ) which is illogical.

Amazing, this logical fallacies stuff.

So much of what I do is based on my "rational" analysis, and now that I'm learning how many logical fallacies I've committed, I'm having to revise so many policies and principles of my living.